Original intent* was Enough Smirking 2.0.
*or 3.0?[Or admiration for nuance]
[Anyway, choice of language was why I was reticent to continue the references to Smirking or Sketches. I mean when does the Etch-A-Sketch stop? I guess it is the nature of campaigns, like a Glenn Beck chalk talk.]
[Speaking of sourcing:
“Unless things change and Obama can run on accomplishments, he will have to kill Romney,” said a prominent Democratic strategist aligned with the White House.Needless to say this is disgusting and should be disavowed by the campaign. However the full context just may be important, not that we have it ! Oar have we?]
**Nature that [!]
[Hint: There is a Mitt of a geometricks re:sourcing.
Or Platonic Multiplicity. Yeah, that's the ticket!
Vu due the math.]
[Hint 2.0? The shortest distance between two points is a punchline. Ouch, not my point, but maybe Romney's straightline. It's geometry, politics and the table. Is Raw Money hiding behind Little Red Riding Hood? Or vaccinating attacks strategy?***]
QED ?
*** Foot N. O. T.?
[TBA: PAGES and De-Baits! i.e.(Note to self) Obama v. Romney recent speeches. JOBS/SCOTUS]
[It's not just me ? (7-6-12) Not Exactly ! The Para-Gone Seg way ? More later. ]
5 comments:
Pardon my ** which is not yet inserted. But may be just as well, given the nature of the path.
I'm not saying that Romney will hide behind a woman as V.P., or that Democrats should be afraid to point that out when he does. But things will be no different when he doesn't. I'm just... not saying.
aka *** FootNOT!
anachronist kills asterisk
The Ed Show? Romney's Atax Dog?
Post a Comment